Goudsmit & Goldschmidt -- a geneasequel - Person Sheet
Goudsmit & Goldschmidt -- a geneasequel - Person Sheet
NameIsak/ Jizchak b’ Henchen Bacharach z roten Schild (Rothschild) 
Birthabt 1590, D, Frankfurt
Death10 Jan 1652, D, Frankfurt
BurialFrankfurt (Battonnstrasse)
Memonot in Epidat
FatherHenchen/ Elchanan b’ Isak Bacharach z roten Schild (1568-~1615)
MotherElchen b’ NN v Wetzlar z roten Schild (~1565-~1620)
Spouses
Birthabt 1590, D, Worms
Death31 Mar 1639, D, Frankfurt
BurialFrankfurt (Battonnstrasse)
Memonot in Epidat
FatherMendle/ Mendel b’ Shimon Oppenheim Worms z roten Löwen (~1560-1635)
MotherEdel/ Adelheid b’ NN (e’ Mendle Oppenheim Worms) (~1560-)
Marriage1608, D, Frankfurt
ChildrenZalman/ Salomo (~1610-)
Raitschen b’ Isak (~1620-1688)
Notes for Isak/ Jizchak b’ Henchen Bacharach z roten Schild (Rothschild)
Parnas
House “roter Schild”
[NB: differences between Dietz, ET and Epidat about his parents. Confusion with the dayan Elchanan/Henchen b’ Moshe Bacharach (d. 23.4.1619) and his wife Eva/Chawe b’ Rafael Ammersweier z goldenen Adler (d. 13.10.1624); cf]
He had at least 7 children [cf ET], a.o:
# Salomo/Zalman b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) >>
# Raitschen b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) (d.2.11.1688) >>
# Moshe b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) z ? (d. 19.10.1656), married to Binlen b’ Chaim Leiter (d. 16.7.1671) — no children mentioned in ET [NB: as Moshe’s mother is stated in ET: Chave b’ Rafael. This can’t be correct — see above]
House “roter Schild”
[NB: differences between Dietz, ET and Epidat about his parents. Confusion with the dayan Elchanan/Henchen b’ Moshe Bacharach (d. 23.4.1619) and his wife Eva/Chawe b’ Rafael Ammersweier z goldenen Adler (d. 13.10.1624); cf]
He had at least 7 children [cf ET], a.o:
# Salomo/Zalman b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) >>
# Raitschen b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) (d.2.11.1688) >>
# Moshe b’ Isak Bacharach (Rothschild) z ? (d. 19.10.1656), married to Binlen b’ Chaim Leiter (d. 16.7.1671) — no children mentioned in ET [NB: as Moshe’s mother is stated in ET: Chave b’ Rafael. This can’t be correct — see above]